The 10th Heismandment

It’s simple: you have to be a somewhat likeable guy to win the Heisman.

Think back on the people who have won the award. None (at the time) were considered jerks by the sports media. Maybe later, their bad sides were revealed. But not while in college.

It takes a lot of media work to win a Heisman. The candidate must be patient, show up on time for interviews and come across as a nice person.

It won’t necessarily help you much if you are a good guy, but you will be hurt if you are a bad guy.

Powered by

About Heismanpundit

Chris Huston, A.K.A. ‘The Heisman Pundit‘, is a Heisman voter and the creator and publisher of, a site dedicated to analysis of the Heisman Trophy and college football. Dubbed “the foremost authority on the Heisman” by Sports Illustrated, HP is regularly quoted or cited during football season in newspapers across the country. He is also a regular contributor on sports talk radio and television.

Follow HP

Find us on Twitter, Facebook and Youtube!

3 Responses to The 10th Heismandment

  1. Mike October 22, 2012 at 7:47 am #

    Could you maybe provide some examples of when this has played a role in the Heisman voting?


  1. - September 3, 2009

    […] could rush for 3,000 yards the rest of the way and still not win the Heisman thanks to his horrible […]

  2. Cameron Newton’s Critical Mass? | Heismanpundit - November 10, 2010

    […] December, the question is: How many Heisman voters will feel comfortable voting for him?  Will Heismandment No. 10 rear its ugly head?  Right now, they don’t think he’s a bad guy, but is that […]