Woo-wee, there is a of stuff on the docket today:
There is clearly something fishy in Denmark with this story. No way does Koetter reverse himself unless the players revealed something very damaging about Keller in that meeting. I’m sure there is more to come on this.
In the meantime, Keller is in a bind and must decide whether to transfer and sit out a year, or go play right away for a 1-AA school.
And ASU is left without a legitimate backup quarterback, some team dissension and a coach who apparently has no clue about the pulse of his team.
Should be a helluva season.
Mandel concurs.
Former Heisman winner Paul Hornung said that the Irish needed to ‘recruit the black athlete’ to bring more speed to the team and he was (appropriately) lambasted for his insensitivity.
But now, the entire offseason has been replete with references to Notre Dame’s lack of speed after Ohio State put on a track meet in the Fiesta Bowl against the Irish.
Never mind that Ted Ginn and Santonio Holmes would run by any secondary in college football, the Irish–and only the Irish–need to get faster.
I mean, clearly the Irish defense was just fast enough to go 9-3 last year and lose two of those games by extremely close margins.
It wasn’t Michigan State’s speed that beat Notre Dame in overtime, but a high-powered offensive scheme captained by a very good quarterback in Drew Stanton.
It wasn’t USC’s speed that beat Notre Dame (and who could stop Reggie Bush anyway?), it was a crazy pass with eyes that would have landed on the turf had it been just one inch closer to Ambrose Wooden’s outstretched fingers.
And for all the talk about the Fiesta Bowl fiasco, Notre Dame was down just seven with a few minutes left and was hurt further by a controverial call that should have resulted in another touchdown–a defensive one at that.
Is Notre Dame’s defense a particularly fast one? No. But it’s no slower than West Virginia’s defense or almost any number of defenses in the top 25.
The obsession with Irish speed makes me wonder if people may have taken what Hornung said to heart after all.
I still don’t understand Florida State being ranked so high, but go figure.
I’m sure he didn’t get much email over that one. Good luck, Tom.
North Carolina is No. 10–who woulda thunk that?
First of all, no way is LSU the fifth best offense, especially since CFN itself admits that the offensive line will be ‘significantly worse’ than last year and two of the running backs are coming off of ACL injuries. Most likely, this ranking is a residual effect of Fiutak calling the Tiger offense ‘the most talented in the country’ the last couple years. Clearly, that was wrong (hello? USC? Texas?) and this ranking is a way to save a little face.
There is talent in Baton Rouge, but LSU as the No. 1 offense in the SEC? What about Auburn?
Another ranking that is off: Florida State No. 10. Does CFN realize that Jeff Bowden is still the offensive coordinator? Or that the Seminoles haven’t been able to run the ball for the better part of this decade?
If you want to go on talent alone, this isn’t a bad list. But more goes into an offense than just talent.
My list of top offenses, taking into account both talent and scheme:
1. Notre Dame
2. Ohio State
3. Louisville
4. Arizona State
5. USC
6. Auburn
7. Texas Tech
8. Michigan State
9. Florida
10. Cal











No comments yet.