A Masoli Skeptic

I noted some comments in the latest Heisman Watch regarding my lack of attention given to Oregon quarterback Jeremiah Masoli.

Don’t get me wrong–I think he’s a good player.  And he had the kind of strong finish to last season that makes you think he could be a dark horse contender in 2009.

But part of me wonders if he wasn’t getting a lot of mileage out of being on his ‘once-around’ in 2008.  Meaning, Pac-10 foes weren’t really used to his skill set upon first meeting and he used that to his advantage, but they will be much better prepared in 2009 now that they have film on him and can study his tendencies closer.

Does that mean he’s in for a letdown this year?  Not necessarily.  I just don’t think he will pick up exactly where he left off in 2008 and that there might actually be some more growing pains to come.

Of course, if he does pick up where he left off, not to worry Ducks fans.  He’ll be on that Heisman Watch in no time.

About Heismanpundit

Chris Huston, A.K.A. ‘The Heisman Pundit‘, is a Heisman voter and the creator and publisher of Heismanpundit.com, a site dedicated to analysis of the Heisman Trophy and college football. Dubbed “the foremost authority on the Heisman” by Sports Illustrated, HP is regularly quoted or cited during football season in newspapers across the country. He is also a regular contributor on sports talk radio and television.

7 Responses to A Masoli Skeptic

  1. Anonymous May 13, 2009 at 12:39 am #

    It depends on the development of the offensive line. The guy has a very strong arm, can hand off to a beast of a runner, has the ability to run over defenders, has several skilled receivers and operates effectively in Kelly’s proven spread offense. However, If the line can’t block, it’s not going to work.

  2. Anonymous May 13, 2009 at 12:46 am #

    Uh the scouting report was out on Masoli after he torched ucla for 180 yards rushing and trucked defenders. The only thing he didn’t have at that time was timing with receivers, but he got that quick. AZ, OSU, and OSU couldn’t stop him from running or passing. He wil be scary good if the o-line can gel quickly

  3. oregonlove78 May 13, 2009 at 8:50 am #

    Uh, this might the most unintelligent piece I have read all off season. The scouting report was out of the bag post UCLA, then Oregon State continually claimed that they had prepared for Masoli as Riley believed he was a great player. What happened…the worse loss in Oregon State history!!! So dude, do a little research before you spout of ridiculous comments that “seem” to have some “thought.” Last but not least, experience experience experience, where have you been writer? Hasn’t history proven to you that guys like this only excel more and more as they are comfortable? Obviously not, have read everything his coaches have said about his improvments, did you watch the spring game? I am going to guess not!!! This kid is ready to pummel teams not only with his legs and arm, but his mental toughness and finesse.

  4. Anonymous May 13, 2009 at 10:30 am #

    If Masoli were at Ohio State or Florida, the article’s assessment might differ. He’s as good as anyone, but goes to the wrong school.

  5. 65-38 May 13, 2009 at 2:16 pm #

    All the better… The last thing masoli needs to focus on is the Heisman race. Time will tell obviously, if he’s that good than he will get talked about. Who really cares right now anyway… not masoli. his improvement last year was tramendous! who ever comes in 3 games into the season,learns a new offense, then dominates as the season goes on? Plus Ohio State is over rated every year and Florida is the real deal. Masoli is on the right team! beavs are just jealous

  6. Roby13 May 15, 2009 at 1:57 am #

    Calm down oregonlove78. This piece was not bashing Masoli. Excuse HP if he doesn’t have him on the short list for Heisman candidates. He gives a fair reason why a Quarterback (who only has 13 starts) could suffer a sophomore slump. Thats it. I myself disagree with HP, but I see why he would make that assessment.

  7. Old Ducker May 19, 2009 at 1:18 pm #

    I think it’s a sign of improvement that HP even devotes a post to Masoli (or any QB not from a handful of schools) at this time. He was among the last to jump on the Dixon bandwagon too.

    The stars may be aligned for the Ducks to be a BCS title contender…a favorable schedule (all the tough conference games at Autzen) plus a very respectable non-conference schedule (BSU, Utah and Purdue). Hopefully the receiving corp won’t underperform for once.

    If the Ducks win the PAC 10, there is no doubt Masoli will be in NY next year.

Leave a Reply