General CFB — 26 June 2009

…from our friends over at Football Talent Advisors.  As we’ve been saying a long time, the best way to gauge speed accurately is to utilize track marks instead of 40 times.   And the best way to verify–or discredit–40 times is to also use track marks as a cross reference.  As FTA notes:

Players that run 11.5 in the 100 can’t  legitimately run 4.4, 4.5, or even 4.6 in the 40…the recruiting sites should learn this!

Don’t hold your breath.  Recruiting sites peddle 40 times like a drug dealer on a street corner.  They’ll say anything to make you buy their product. 

I’d say that if you don’t see an electronically timed 10.60 or better in the 100m (or a sub-21.50 200m or at least a 24-foot long jump) on a player’s resume, then you could pretty much discount the report that he has run a legitimate 4.3 or better in the 40-yard dash.  There will always be a couple exceptions–some athletes don’t have access to proper track coaching or facilities, some play center field in baseball instead–but as a general rule, track marks more accurately reflect true speed.

Related Articles

Share

About Author

Heismanpundit

Chris Huston, A.K.A. ‘The Heisman Pundit‘, is a Heisman voter and the creator and publisher of Heismanpundit.com, a site dedicated to analysis of the Heisman Trophy and college football. Dubbed “the foremost authority on the Heisman” by Sports Illustrated, HP is regularly quoted or cited during football season in newspapers across the country. He is also a regular contributor on sports talk radio and television.

(0) Readers Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.