Comments on: Picking the Bowl Games http://heismanpundit.com/2009/12/21/picking-the-bowl-games-2/ Breaking Down The Politics Of The Most Prestigious Award In Sports Thu, 09 Sep 2010 21:30:13 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Bucknut http://heismanpundit.com/2009/12/21/picking-the-bowl-games-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13242 Bucknut Thu, 07 Jan 2010 08:21:29 +0000 http://heismanpundit.com/?p=4091#comment-13242 Yes it could be. But I don't honestly see the Pac 10 staying in that downward cycle. Course I did hear HP say the Big 10 was slow and physical and that proved to be wrong in the bowls. Yes it could be. But I don’t honestly see the Pac 10 staying in that downward cycle. Course I did hear HP say the Big 10 was slow and physical and that proved to be wrong in the bowls.

]]> By: CloroxingTheGenePool http://heismanpundit.com/2009/12/21/picking-the-bowl-games-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13238 CloroxingTheGenePool Thu, 07 Jan 2010 01:53:04 +0000 http://heismanpundit.com/?p=4091#comment-13238 Bucknut, you might be surprised about the Pac 10's faceplant in the bowls only if you had been reading HP's blog entries and posts. Signals the beginning of a downward cycle for the conference, imo, which will certainly be harder to overcome with the University of Smug Cheater's rightful hammering by the NCAA..... Bucknut, you might be surprised about the Pac 10′s faceplant in the bowls only if you had been reading HP’s blog entries and posts. Signals the beginning of a downward cycle for the conference, imo, which will certainly be harder to overcome with the University of Smug Cheater’s rightful hammering by the NCAA…..

]]> By: Bucknut http://heismanpundit.com/2009/12/21/picking-the-bowl-games-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13216 Bucknut Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:55:00 +0000 http://heismanpundit.com/?p=4091#comment-13216 I am surprised by the pac 10's performance this year in the bowls. I am surprised by the pac 10′s performance this year in the bowls.

]]> By: Bucknut http://heismanpundit.com/2009/12/21/picking-the-bowl-games-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13196 Bucknut Sat, 02 Jan 2010 21:38:45 +0000 http://heismanpundit.com/?p=4091#comment-13196 Big 10 is better than people thought, and the sec is worse than people thought. (not including Florida and Alabama) Big 10 is better than people thought, and the sec is worse than people thought. (not including Florida and Alabama)

]]> By: CloroxingTheGenePool http://heismanpundit.com/2009/12/21/picking-the-bowl-games-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13189 CloroxingTheGenePool Sat, 02 Jan 2010 10:54:19 +0000 http://heismanpundit.com/?p=4091#comment-13189 Pac 10 = 2-5 in bowls, with wins over Boston College and Temple. With USC's looming hammering by the NCAA, things don't look to be improving much anytime soon. Pac 10 = 2-5 in bowls, with wins over Boston College and Temple. With USC’s looming hammering by the NCAA, things don’t look to be improving much anytime soon.

]]> By: Bucknut http://heismanpundit.com/2009/12/21/picking-the-bowl-games-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13170 Bucknut Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:57:44 +0000 http://heismanpundit.com/?p=4091#comment-13170 How bout them badgers. How bout them badgers.

]]> By: Bucknut http://heismanpundit.com/2009/12/21/picking-the-bowl-games-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13169 Bucknut Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:57:28 +0000 http://heismanpundit.com/?p=4091#comment-13169 I'm sorry pac 10 is 2-3 in bowl games. Boy Air Force is giving it to Houston. I’m sorry pac 10 is 2-3 in bowl games. Boy Air Force is giving it to Houston.

]]> By: Bucknut http://heismanpundit.com/2009/12/21/picking-the-bowl-games-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13168 Bucknut Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:55:34 +0000 http://heismanpundit.com/?p=4091#comment-13168 Pac 10 1-3 in bowl games. Pac 10 1-3 in bowl games.

]]> By: Bucknut http://heismanpundit.com/2009/12/21/picking-the-bowl-games-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13108 Bucknut Thu, 24 Dec 2009 08:29:56 +0000 http://heismanpundit.com/?p=4091#comment-13108 Pac 10 0-2 thus far in bowl game play. This coming from a frustrated big ten buckeye. Also I think Oh State vs Or State gonna be a little closer than the experts think. The key will be to shut down Masoli and James, or it'll be a long day. Pac 10 0-2 thus far in bowl game play. This coming from a frustrated big ten buckeye. Also I think Oh State vs Or State gonna be a little closer than the experts think. The key will be to shut down Masoli and James, or it’ll be a long day.

]]> By: PAC 10 Homer http://heismanpundit.com/2009/12/21/picking-the-bowl-games-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13107 PAC 10 Homer Thu, 24 Dec 2009 04:55:30 +0000 http://heismanpundit.com/?p=4091#comment-13107 Yet again, another piece with needless comments attacking the SEC. Man, you're incorrigible. Just write about football and leave the defensiveness of the PAC 10 and the bitterness against the SEC and the press coverage the SEC gets at home (this from a guy whose conference gets the benefit of the TOTALLY overhyped Rose Bowl..."Grand-daddy of the all"). You're like the boy who cried wolf...you've lost all credibility when it comes to analyzing conference strength because of your amazing ability to insert a slight at the SEC or the press coverage of the SEC into almost any piece of football commentary - this piece has both, and as far as I can tell not another conference get's anywhere near the same negative treatment (and I'm not talking about predicting Ws and Ls, I'm talking about comments like those about LSU, Kentucky, and Arkansas vs ECU. You're better than that HP! You have a good football mind, but need a little more journalistic integrity...of course I keep saying that and you keep crying about the PAC 10. Yet again, another piece with needless comments attacking the SEC. Man, you’re incorrigible. Just write about football and leave the defensiveness of the PAC 10 and the bitterness against the SEC and the press coverage the SEC gets at home (this from a guy whose conference gets the benefit of the TOTALLY overhyped Rose Bowl…”Grand-daddy of the all”). You’re like the boy who cried wolf…you’ve lost all credibility when it comes to analyzing conference strength because of your amazing ability to insert a slight at the SEC or the press coverage of the SEC into almost any piece of football commentary – this piece has both, and as far as I can tell not another conference get’s anywhere near the same negative treatment (and I’m not talking about predicting Ws and Ls, I’m talking about comments like those about LSU, Kentucky, and Arkansas vs ECU.

You’re better than that HP! You have a good football mind, but need a little more journalistic integrity…of course I keep saying that and you keep crying about the PAC 10.

]]>